Blog

Swayed by the tenor of DIAGRAM, each text becomes comparable to the next, and reading takes on an experiential value akin to seeing.  >

Header_puff
Tournlogo Advert

Tiny Revolutions

Marcus Westbury January 20

In 2008, Marcus Westbury founded the Renew Newcastle project – a low-budget, DIY scheme that sought to reenergise the city by making abandoned spaces available for use by local artists. In the December issue of Meanjin, he considers how such creative experimentation might survive in a world that often demands starkly rationalist results, and whether big change can come of small things. A brief extract is below, and you can now read the full essay on our editions page.



Even in my student years Newcastle was a great do-it-yourself town. There were lots of young, enthusiastic people. It was big enough but not too big and the perpetual exodus of talent created gaps that allowed many new things to always be starting. That rich cultural vein was not often obvious though. It was hard to point out to an outsider where to find it. Typical of many DIY cultures, it was a vibrant but largely unpretentious creativity—it wasn’t a showy place but people were engaged in many kinds of activity and some occasional pointless experimentation.

Today these creators are spread across the old city and its suburbs, working on their micro record labels, crafts, jewellery, fashion design, art and music, creating quietly and often alone—only occasionally coming together in a market, a back yard, a festival or a pub.

They have always been there and yet in the last few years something about them has changed. They have slowly—individually as much as collectively—been connecting with the wider world. In my time Newcastle lacked much in the way of options for finance or recognition. The new global cultures have begun to reconfigure that. Where once the best and brightest left or eventually gave in to the gravitational pull of the day job there are many paths now that recognise and even inspire small-scale initiative.

It is the defining feature of twenty-first-century culture that small niches of specialised work are finding an international audience. Today’s bedroom musicians are global musicians, our suburban handicrafts are international exports. There is a plethora of support networks from DIY guides to forums and global marketplaces such as Etsy.com. They have seeded not just a change in consumption but also of cultural production and initiative. Being creative in a small town or a regional city is no longer an isolating or eccentric activity. Anyone creative can now be connected to support networks, communities, appreciative fans and markets that reach well beyond the physical boundaries of any place. It is a culture of what I have come to call ‘initiativists’—those with the temperament to create, experiment and put the results out there. We often talk of capital as being the driver of innovation, but for creative communities it is often simply the price of it—and online marketplaces, international shipping and free information sharing have dramatically reduced that price. Online much of the innovation is motivated less by economic returns than by the economically irrational motivations of creativity and possibility.

For cities such as Newcastle—or indeed any city hollowed by the aftershocks of the global financial crisis—there are possibilities. This culture of initiative, experimentation and innovation is a potentially transformative force, both culturally and economically. The ability to make and export things from local spaces to global markets offers not only cultural exchange but also economic potential. The creative industries seeded and accelerated by the low barriers to entry online offer potential new patterns of development, activity and employment. The ability to channel them to and through struggling regional centres could mean the difference between vibrancy and decay.

Yet this fluid and enthusiastic online DIY culture doesn’t sit easily in the real world. It clashes with capital in a way that reveals many complexities, inefficiencies and challenges. Capital wants, and has created, large-scale spaces. Creativity and innovation need small ones. Capital wants long-term certainty and fixed and predictable planning, while the culture of online creativity thrives on uncertainty and experimentation. Capital wants predictable returns and creativity wants open-ended possibility. So the challenge of engaging the creativity within our cities to remake and renew them is to ensure that our offline communities start behaving a little more like our online ones.


 

 

Only the comment field is required. Omitting the ID fields increases your risk of being mistaken for spam.