On Writing and Identity
JA
May 27

The question of what you ‘do’ is a staple part of any conversation, cropping up inevitably somewhere after the hellos and generic comments about the place/day/location/weather. A big part of it, I suppose, reflects just how much our chosen ‘profession’ is thought to reflect on who we are (whatever that means nowadays).
Most of time, I’ll juggle between several options – some days it’s a student (sometimes arts, sometimes law), other days I’ll say I work in publishing or, if I’m feeling particularly specific, that I’m an editorial assistant. I don’t think that I’ve ever quite managed to say ‘writer’, the noun. If the conversation pans down that path, I usually resort to the verb (‘sometimes I write’), or the aspirational (‘trying to write’).
First off, I don’t want to romanticise the desire to identify as a writer too much – at the end of the day, we are lucky to get to write and perception is just a small part of it, but the various clichés or social cringes that come with this are a point of interest. I suppose a lot of my evasions have to do with a general unwillingness to have to go into the exposition that must necessarily follow, particularly amongst a certain crowd, who might ask how much you’ve had published, and where, as if trying to work out just how much of you is a legitimate writer and how much isn’t. Or worse still, follow-up with the question ‘But what do you really do?’, because after all, art can only ever be a hobby and doesn’t fly in the ‘real world’. Ben O’Mara has written a fantastic essay on this in the current June edition of Meanjin. He recalls a conversation with his manager, who suggested, with the best of intentions, that he ‘meet regularly with a group of friends to help [him] deal with [his] passion?’ He continues:
My accountant was worse. He is a nice guy, successful. He doesn’t look much older than me, but has a wife, children, a nice home in an attractive Melbourne suburb and a relaxed, easygoing demeanour that belies the years he has spent crunching numbers. Many finance people I’ve worked with can be quite uptight. But when he tried to list my freelance writing work as ‘just a hobby’ on my tax return, I almost punched him in the face. In the true spirit of artistic wankery, I thrust my ABN at him, announced myself as a professional writer, proudly declared the two thousand dollars I’d made in articles (which paled in comparison with my staff salary), and demanded we find more tax deductions for all my hard writing work. He sheepishly obliged.
Maybe it’s also a little to do with a general lack of entitlement – I know that I’ve been lucky enough to have my first novel signed, but I still don’t feel any different about myself than I did before. At the airport, I once tried putting ‘writer’ on that green customs card – it felt strange and daggy/cool, but also a bit like a lie, because realistically, with the exception of last year, writing is not what takes up the most of my time. In fact, quite the opposite. Spike has written before about day jobs and the like, and realistically I think that breaking up the routine can be good thing. Even if I had the chance to write full-time, I’m not sure that I would, however it’s a slippery slope between hoping to write most of the time to not at all. Over at the Millions, Nell Boeschenstein has written frankly about the contrast between what your resume might say about you, and how you might perceive yourself:
By the time I graduated from college, enough people had told me I couldn’t make a living this way for me to begin trying to jury rig my skills and interests into skills and interests that paid. I worked as an English teacher, a crime reporter, a waitress, a library assistant, and as a research assistant for authors. With each job I told myself it was temporary: just a job until I could forge a writing career. Alas, the most money I’ve ever earned for a piece of writing I’ve written because I wanted to write it is $50, and that was a month ago. Until recently I had—naively—not considered fully demoting my future writing career to past, present, and future hobby, but the reality is that the time has past come.
On the flip-side, there’s also how identifying yourself as a writer is perceived by others. Again from O’Mara:
After a series of similar rejections, and a few Centrelink training seminars, I excluded my creative writing university credentials from my CV. In my experience, most employers don’t take kindly to arts degrees. I learned that being a writer meant I often had to hide being a writer. Wait, let me rephrase that—I had to ‘repackage’ my skills for the dynamic, innovative and street-smart workplaces of the new millennium. It seemed odd that all my friends, family and teachers encouraged me to write and to devote so much of my study to creative writing through high school and university, and yet suddenly I was on my arse without a job and being told I was just ‘another arts graduate’ who needed a crash course in reality.
And later,
… [for] many of my workmates, writing made no sense. It was a waste of time in a world of priorities, spread sheets, smart phones and late-night work meetings because socialising was just easier with workmates, key stakeholders and potential funding bodies. The worst thing was the perception that writing was a sign that you just needed to work out ‘some emotional issues’.
Do things get clearer as your career progresses? Not always. In an interview in our March issue (Vol 69/1), Steven Amsterdam admitted that he still puts down ‘nurse’ when filling out forms, despite his huge success (winning the Age Book of the Year in 2009, making it onto the VCE reading list for 2011, popular and critical acclaim and so on). Although he did also stress that this had a lot to with not wanting to put too much pressure on himself as well.
Added onto this is the curious role that funding bodies have to play on how we conceptualise being a writer. Browsing the various grant categories online for the first time, I wondered whether I was a ‘new’, ‘emerging’ or ‘developing’ writer. When would I get to be an ‘established’ one? The answer, according to the website, was based on the number of publications – ten short stories, at least three novels, a ‘body of work’. I can certainly see the point of dividing from an organisational point of view – it doesn’t make sense to pit experienced writers against those just starting out, particularly when competition is already so high. Nevertheless, I couldn’t help but feel like I was trying to emerge through various stages of the administrative chrysalis as I checked and unchecked boxes.
Justine Larbalestrier has tried to make a distinction based on ‘writer as career’ versus ‘writer as identity’. Basically:
When I’m talking about writer as identity I (try to remember to) use the term “writer.” When I’m talking writer as career I (try to remember to) use the term “author” or “novelist.”
I have been a writer since I first learned how as a small child. I have been an author since I sold my first novel. There was a thirty year gap between the two. During the time that I was a writer-not-an-author I wrote hundreds of poems and short stories, and beginnings of novels, and two novels. That writing was a huge part of who I was. When I didn’t write I was miserable. When I was writing a lot I was joyous.
Our Friends
- Overland
- Alien Onion
- Ampersand Duck
- Andrew McDonald
- A Pair of Ragged Claws
- Arts Victoria
- Australia Council for the Arts
- Ben Eltham
- Bookshow blog
- CAL
- City of Tongues
- Crikey
- darkly wise, rudely great
- David Astle
- Elmo Keep Does Stuff
- The Ember
- Fly the Falcon blog
- Going Down Swinging
- Griffith Review
- Hackpacker
- Harvest
- HEAT
- Island
- Killings blog
- Literary Minded
- Lorraine Crescent
- Lynden Barber
- Mandy Ord
- Marcus Westbury
- Matilda
- Meanland
- Melbourne University Publishing
- Mel Campbell
- The Monthly
- Musings of an Inappropriate Woman
- Oslo Davis
- Paul Callaghan
- Read, Think, Write
- Sleepers Publishing
- Sorrow at Sills Bend
- SPLOG
- Tom Cho
- Virgule
- Wet Ink
- Wheeler Centre
Comments
27 May 10 at 9:27
Justine Larbalestrier makes an apt distinction. Our identity through what we do for a living is all too often muddled up with who we are as a person, and I think there’s a sense of clarity that comes in identifying as a writer, not as a job, but as a part of who you are. (Although I did meet a creative man who put it well – he was a “library assistant by day and an experimental film-maker by night”)
...27 May 10 at 10:11
I’m a bit obsessed with this question myself. I get lots of weird reactions particularly from work mates when I call myself a writer, even without giving away that I write Marxist fiction.
Some of them asked to read my stuff which wasn’t the best thing to do considering I write about arsehole bosses most of the time.
I think this is so tied into the idea that, under capitalism, our identity is so tied to how we labour or earn a wage which seems stupid given that what I do between 9 and 5 is the least conscious and free choice I make. I am not myself at work, just leasing out my body to do things other people want me to do. I am more myself at home, writing, or on the streets protesting.
...27 May 10 at 11:19
I think that writers these days are a bit more grounded in the knowledge that their B.A. isn’t necessarily going to get them a job. It’s known to just about everyone that the competition for jobs that have guaranteed stability is among the fiercest going. And landing any kind of paid gig in new areas such as blogging seems to be serendipitous at best.
So you have a lot of 5-9 (-10, -12, -2, -ohmygodthesuniscomingup) writers, working on their manuscripts in the evening, with maybe the occasional week off to do really major work. And while I would say that 99% of those writers wish they could throw off the yoke of labour in order to more fully pursue their craft, they are aware that doing so might result in financial ruin and the horrifying prospect of moving back in with their parents.
...27 May 10 at 12:43
I think Guy Rundle and Ben O'Mara’s essays in the latest Meanjin really spoke to each other; the inclusion of both improved each of them, I think: on the one hand, Rundle writes about how young writers these days can ‘see a possible and structured future—a life of moving through the stages of small group funding, individual grants, residencies, creative activity teaching positions, and so on. Such a future is hardly secure, but it is achievable’, while on the other, O'Mara offers an account of the difficulty of this. They, in a way, offer commentary on each other, making each other more insightful. Good work, Meanjin team!
...27 May 10 at 12:46
I used to shudder at the question, “what do you do?” I am so much more than what I get paid for! I thought.
I then decided I would stop asking this question myself, and weasel out of answering it myself. The result? Some ridiculously tense dinner conversations where people either assumed I was ‘a bum’ (gasp!) or plain pretentious. Both situations sucked.
So now I’ve come up with the statement “I am a writer working in communications” and I’m sticking with it.
Judgement, be damned.
...27 May 10 at 12:53
Thank you plume of words -trying to get essays to ‘speak to each other’ is exactly what i see my job as being.
As for me, I found it hard to put ‘writer’ down on forms even in the years in which I did it full time. It’s so vague in one sense. Was I saying I was a journalist? A novelist (and if so, was I prepared to answer questions like – ‘what kind of novels do you write?’) What exactly does the word writer mean?
etc.
...27 May 10 at 20:33
Interesting post and comment string and yes I too find it fascinating the whole question of writing, writer, and identity.
After a residency at Bundanon in New South Wales last year I decided that I’d be very, very frank to people about being a writer. Writing is my career, it’s my desire; it’s what really turns my crank; it’s what makes me feel the most alive. Which is why, when I came home from Bundanon, I decided to establish a website as a very clear statement of intent. And calling it ‘Open to Public’ was for a damn good reason – I wanted to literally be open to people about what I’ve achieved and what I still hope to achieve.
The majority of my income doesn’t come from writing, but it does come from the arts. So for me I say I’m a writer and that I also work in the arts. It’s clunky but it’s also friggin' accurate.
Yes, I get funny looks. But do I care? Nope.
...27 May 10 at 21:16
That box on the departure card is a weird one and always sends me into a dizzy spin…I guess because it’s not often we have such an official sense of defining ourselves. I think last time I wrote writer if only to make myself feel better about being an expat wife.
...28 May 10 at 13:43
Great post Meanjin – glad my article was useful re dialogue on writing and identity.
Thanks plumeofwords for the kind words. And you’re right Meanjin are great at creating dialogue between articles. I found Rundle’s essay to be important in terms of how we ‘internalize’ wider state and social processes, and the need to be wary of the ways in which this happens. Fascinating stuff. I see similarities in terms of themes to Brophy’s book Creativity: http://www.amazon.com/Creativity-Psychoanalysis-Surrealism-Creative-Writing/dp/0522847862
I was struck by the article’s suggestion that creative writing students do not live in a ‘literary’ culture. My experience studying creative writing in the late 90s was very different.
I was born the year Star Wars was released and sunk my teeth into The Simpsons, Southpark and X-Files etc during my high school and university years. Pop culture did and continues to weave itself through my life and work. When people talk about generational differences, sometimes I think of myself as a ‘Gen X/Y rising’. Dunno whether that’s a good or bad thing.
At the same time, books, reading, discussing theory and engaging with literary culture etc was an important part of mine and my friends’ lives. I loved reading Joyce, Mishima, Woolf and when I was introduced to Tom Wolfe and H. S. Thompson it was like a whole new world had opened up for me. I found it essential and just part of my life as a writer and reader. In any university course some students aren’t going to be passionate, and people study creative writing for a range of reasons. Maybe things are different now, however. It would be a useful qualitative research project in relation to policy, teaching and other work in the area, and I think embellish and possibly counter some of Rundle’s points.
Lyrian and Nigel – luv your style:
“I am a writer working in communications” and I’m sticking with it.
“So for me I say I’m a writer and that I also work in the arts. It’s clunky but it’s also friggin' accurate. Yes, I get funny looks. But do I care? Nope.”
Awesome. Better to not worry about what other people think is what I’ve learned. Just gotta run with being a writer and see where it takes you I reckon.
...