Just say yes to Mad Men
Sophie Cunningham
August 31
I’m assuming – hoping – you’ve all heard about the Bechdel Test. That’s the guide to movies, based on comic Alison Bechdel’s work. It is very simple. For a film to pass the test:
- It has to have at least two women in it
- Who talk to each other
- About something besides a man
Most films fail it. It’s quite interesting to apply this test to films you’ve seen in the last month. For me, those films were, in order of viewing Inception:
The Ghost Writer
and Scott Pilgrim vs the World.
The answer, in those cases is NO, NO, and NO. (And incidentally, the film of those I would recommend is The Ghost Writer.)
My current viewing obsession is Mad Men (Season 4 – the current one). And may I introduce you to two of its female stars, Joan and Peggy. Here they are in a scene together from, I think, Season 1. It’s worth nothing that all their scenes together are just fantastic:
Does Mad Men pass the Bechdel Test? OH MY FUCKING GOD YES, IN EVERY IMAGINABLE WAY. You ask me what feminist television looks like? It took this a way to dawn on me, but these days, I’d say it looks like Mad Men. It’s about women in the work place. It’s about the construction of gender. It’s about the painful move towards change for women in the sixties. A longer post to justify this statement coming really, really soon. But now I’ve watched so many You Tube clips I have to get back to work.
Our Friends
- Overland
- Alien Onion
- Ampersand Duck
- Andrew McDonald
- A Pair of Ragged Claws
- Arts Victoria
- Australia Council for the Arts
- Ben Eltham
- Bookshow blog
- CAL
- City of Tongues
- Crikey
- darkly wise, rudely great
- David Astle
- Elmo Keep Does Stuff
- The Ember
- Fly the Falcon blog
- Going Down Swinging
- Griffith Review
- Hackpacker
- Harvest
- HEAT
- Island
- Killings blog
- Literary Minded
- Lorraine Crescent
- Lynden Barber
- Mandy Ord
- Marcus Westbury
- Matilda
- Meanland
- Melbourne University Publishing
- Mel Campbell
- The Monthly
- Musings of an Inappropriate Woman
- Oslo Davis
- Paul Callaghan
- Read, Think, Write
- Sleepers Publishing
- Sorrow at Sills Bend
- SPLOG
- Tom Cho
- Virgule
- Wet Ink
- Wheeler Centre
Comments
31 Aug 10 at 9:31
I love the Bechdel Test.
I’m up to the same season of MM and I completely agree with your take on this. Ultimately though, I think the show is about the construction of identity itself.
Many thanks for the post. (As an aside, how awful was ‘Inception’? Or am I the only one who thinks so?)
...31 Aug 10 at 10:17
I saw ‘The Ghost Writer’ on Sunday and was about to apply the test when you saved me the trouble up there. But doesn’t the catty exchange between the PA and the wife about polishing one’s nails in the back of the car count? Probably not — that’s ‘about a man’ subtextually, I guess. Does subtext count?
...31 Aug 10 at 10:39
I think on the season 1 DVD one of the writers/producers or some such behind Mad Men described it as a show about the insecurities of the American male and the people who suffer because of it – namely the women: Peggy, Joan, Betty etc. For some reason that description has always stuck in my head as rather apt.
...31 Aug 10 at 10:58
Kerryn – I did have to think about the Ghost Writer, in that they have the two women in it, both of whom are important characters. But I felt their interaction was all about their relationship with Adam Lang so I suppose I’m saying that subtext counts – or it does in that example anyway. That said, I did think Ruth Lang was a terrific character – albeit in very much in the film noir (duplicitous woman) mode. But she was riveting.
...31 Aug 10 at 11:01
singular-plural stuff up alert: ‘ in that they have the two women in it, both of whom are important characters.’ should read ‘in that it has . ..’
...31 Aug 10 at 14:33
Yes, I was almost joking when I asked if subtext counted — if it didn’t, what a very thin thing fiction (including narrative/dramatic film) would be. I agree with you about the Ruth character — not least because she was practically the only actor in the movie apart from Ewan McGregor himself to maintain any kind of convincing or consistent accent, thereby not constantly testing our suspended disbelief the way most of the others did. The friend I saw the movie with told me that apparently Polanski insisted they all say their lines exactly as he modelled them, which would explain everything, including why Pierce Brosnan sounded half-Irish half-Polish when he was supposed to be more or less Tony Blair.
...31 Aug 10 at 19:17
I did not know about the Bechdel test. Count me educated.
(But aren’t Peggy and Joan discussing a man in that first part of the scene?)
...31 Aug 10 at 19:49
Well, they’re discussing the fact men expect them to be supplicants, which is different to fighting over a man. But I take the point. It was hard to get a clip of them – most were disabled so I couldn’t embed them.
...