Blog

The uncomfortable truth revealed in Binet’s book is that readers should always have this guard up, and rarely do. Even though we know we are reading an historical novel, and authors ram that messag...  >

Other

After the fall: A few thoughts on Borders and the future of bookselling

JA February 22

borders

As you may have heard, last week it was announced that the REDgroup, who own Borders and Angus & Robertson, as well as Whitcoulls in New Zealand, had gone into voluntary administration. This followed the news that Borders in the US (which is owned by a separate company) had also collapsed.

Needless to say, the report brought about a flurry of comment – The Wheeler Centre have done a good round-up of the post-mortems here, and we’ve also wrapped up a few more thoughts on the situation below.

The whys and wherefores

The news that Borders was in trouble would not have come as a surprise to many – the rumours had been swarming for months – but the reasons for the chain’s fall still remain somewhat of a contested issue.

REDgroup chairman Steven Cain attempted to lay the blame at the feet of the government for failing to change the law on parallel importation (which state that foreign editions of a book may not be imported if Australian publishers release a local edition within the 30 day timeframe), and the ongoing barrier of the GST (namely that books imported from overseas are not liable for GST, and therefore can be sold at cheaper rates).

These claims, particularly the former, was eagerly echoed by Dymocks director Bob Carr:

This just shows the foolishness of protectionism – the government wanted to protect the book publishing industry … but it disadvantaged a great slab of jobs and businesses in the retail sector.

Other commentators, however, have been quick to point out the REDgroup’s poor strategising and bad stock management.

This from Richard Flanagan over at the Age:

A&R’s strategy was, I was told some years ago by one of their senior executives, to go to war with the publishers and win. They looked to retailers like Woolworths as their model, with their crushing of the suppliers and producers as the key to making more money.

And from Scribe’s Henry Rosenbloom:

… Borders/A&R in its REDgroup incarnation was a very badly run business, for which the owners, Pacific Equity Partners, a private-equity group, are responsible. PEP deliberately created a brutalist regime: they installed bovver-boy managers who alienated all their inherited knowledgeable staff (who left), made appalling decisions about stock selection and presentation, and tried to treat books like potatoes. They were focused on fluffing up the business so it could be floated, so all they seemed to care about was inventory control and their cash position.

… [S]everal times last year, the group was ‘on stop’ with major publishers — that is, the publishers refused to supply books to them because the group was in breach of its credit limits and trading terms. At other times, the group simply stopped re-ordering titles that were selling or ordering new-release titles that might have sold.

Anyone who’s been to Borders in recent times would be hard pressed to deny that they’ve dropped the ball. In its early days, the chain may have fulfilled the buyer’s wish of stocking every book imaginable, but this, in my experience anyway, was short lived. I can’t even count the number of times I ducked inside in search of a particular title only to find repeatedly that they didn’t stock it (or that they had woefully shelved it in some bizarre place), whilst over ordering on others.

In truth, the reasons for the fall are probably to do with a combination of several factors, including poorly thought-out, brutish tactics, sloppy buying, the rise of online bookselling and the digital market, the GST and the high Aussie dollar. Yet, criticisms aside, the news is still deeply sobering – especially given the potential for mass job cuts, and the flow-on effects for publishers and writers. Say what you will, but Borders and A&R were highly visible and, according to Flanagan, represented about 20% of Australian book retailing. So then, the next logical question is what this gap might mean for consumers, as well as the industry as a whole, in future?

Bookselling and the future

I’m not going to jump on the doomsday bandwagon and say that this is the beginning of the end for bricks-and-mortar bookshops – one because I doubt this will be the case, and two because I sincerely hope it won’t be. Voluntary administration does not necessarily mean that Borders or A&R will shut up shop. They may survive for some time yet in one form or another, cost-cutting here and there, closing less-profitable branches. But I do think that the industry is shifting, and that the way we conceive of retailers and their physical presence is changing for the long term.

I freely admit that this is largely guesswork, but there seems little point in shutting our eyes and hoping that we’ll make it to Point B intact. And, let’s face it, it never hurts to give the magic-8 ball a bit of a shake.

One prediction is that online bookselling, and ebooks, will swoop in to grab up more of the market share. I’ve blogged on the Book Depository and co before, so won’t go into great detail again, but it’s easy to see that they have the ability to do what Borders hoped to in terms of seemingly stocking every title under the sun, yet without many of the costs.

The second is of course that the independents might be able to reassert themselves. John Birmingham has written eloquently on the idea of a ‘renaissance [for] the independent bookshop sector’, who tend to provide a more ‘bespoke service, with a lot of hand selling of small print run high value books’. This is one crucial thing that neither Borders nor the online have managed yet to replicate: the browsing experience, or, to borrow shamelessly from Phill English, the curatorial experience. This is something that is constantly repeated in conversations about bookselling – consumers want the product, yes, but they also place a high value on the atmosphere, the ability to drift through the shelves and discover, at leisure, beautiful editions of books by great authors.

The more interesting question is, I think, whether someone will discover a model that makes the best of both worlds – a system that distributes and sells books cheaply and efficiently, while still retaining that all-important curatorial vision. Guy Rundle, blogging over at Crikey, has argued that this is only a matter of time;

… [T]he online shopping environment is still, in many ways, less user-friendly than real 3D browsing … But eventually and soon, they will crack it, and the existing way of working through lists and keywords to buy books (or kindle texts), will look incredibly creaky. For all sorts of products, a 3-D browsing environment will eventually be established.


 

Comments

by Sophie
22 Feb 11 at 12:04

Great summary of the situation, Jess.

...
by Jess
22 Feb 11 at 12:21

Ta! Another thought I just had, with help of Jack, was that if say the online industry (i.e Book Depository) did end up getting a greater slice of the market due to this, then this could have an interesting impact on publishers. Eg. Through local bricks-and-mortar bookshops, it is generally set that local editions will be sold. If with more ppl were to buy via the online, then it’s likely overseas editions will be the ones purchased. So then what would that mean for local houses, and authors? Not sure if I have anything conclusion to say, but just thinking thoughts…

...
by Malcolm
22 Feb 11 at 12:28

Much of the comment around the failure is misinformed, speculates wildly or takes one of the factors in the decline and throws it up as THE reason… Thank you for your far more rational response, and the acknowledgement of the staff. A level of humanity that many enjoying the death of their ‘foe’ could embrace. One thing missing in the debate is the additional acknowledgement that chain booksellers sell a different mix on the whole to the ‘bespoke’ independents. Further, the number of independents who take this approach is limited, and not every independent has the skills and expertise to take a curatorial approach. Those that do should still survive and with innovative approaches to pricing from some publishers (read that as a cut in RRP on imported books) along with events, social media, fostering the local literary communities, and deeper conversations and engagement with their customers etc they could thrive. They are not the majority of the book industry’s turnover however, and the engine room of mainstream publishing, be it Bryce Courtenay, John Grisham, Dan Brown, Stephanie Meyer or Harry Potter will suffer locally as more and more sales are either lost overseas or lost for good. There is no such thing as ‘The Book Market’ … no certainty of numbers… no natural level… It expands and contracts with opportunity and attitude and over the last year the consumers discretionary spending habits have changed. Whether that change is irrevocable, short or long-term remains to be seen, but the Book Industry needs to make account for it, and not lay the blame at the breakdown of Australian’s largest book group, as culpable as it may be for its own situation.

...
by phill
22 Feb 11 at 13:20

Eloquent as always, Jess. And like Malcolm, I’m glad to see that you’ve highlighted the fact that it’s terrible news for the employees of these franchises. I know a few friends who work at these chains and are pretty devo at the fact that they will lose their jobs (and at the fact that they’ve had to explain the voucher situation to customers).

...
by Tru
22 Feb 11 at 14:56

I know, in my local area, one of the reasons A&R lost a large part of their customer base, due to their marking up books approx 10% on RRP. A very shortsighted strategy which is definitely not designed to build a loyal customer base.

...
by Simon
23 Feb 11 at 13:02

“This is one crucial thing that neither Borders nor the online have managed yet to replicate: the browsing experience, or, to borrow shameless from Phill English, the curatorial experience.”

I disagree.

Browsing Amazon’s catalogue, its Listmania, and “Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought” list has introduced me to more authors and books then any bricks-and-mortar bookstore has ever done. I can also browse more easily all the book covers at Amazon, rather than just the ones a bookstore chooses to display face out.

When Wolf Hall won the Man Booker, I went all over Melbourne looking for Mantel’s backlist, and in particular, A Place of Greater Safety. Not one bookstore, not Readings, not Readers' Feast or Borders or A&R, had anything in stock but Wolf Hall. Not one person I asked had heard of APoGS.

When a bookstore staff recommends a book to me, it’s always little more than “This is good, try it” or “Oh if you like X, then you should try Y”, or “This has been selling very well”. None of which even comes close to persuade me to buy the book. What will convince me is a review from Publlishers Weekly or New Yorker or Kirkus, or The Guardian or The Age or The ABR, all of which I can usually find at Amazon/Web.

If independent bookstores are so good at promoting Australian books and authors, why so few (any?) of them has a bookshelf devoted entirely to Australian books — old and new —– placed at the entrance of the store? When I walk into an independent, the front is the same as Borders: the latest releases, the overseas award winners, the popular thrillers, the celebrity memoirs.

I have seen more copies of Hazzard’s The Great Fire in op-shops then in independent bookstores. Why is it so hard to find a National Book Award winner?

And why did I have so much trouble finding a copy of Cloud Street in any bookstore to buy for an Irish friend as a way to introducing him to Australian literature?

In my experience, independent bookstores have very little to offer.

...
by Adrian Deans
28 Feb 11 at 10:26

As noted by Tru, I was very annoyed at the practice of both Borders and A&R of adding 10% to the RRP. When my book came out last year, the local Dymocks sold it at RRP while the A&R around the corner added 10%. Last time I checked, A&R had sold less than 10 copies while Dymocks had sold nearly 150. Also had it reported to me that one particular Borders store (in a main location) refused to get it in despite being asked on numerous occasions by different people. Just bewildering bloody mindedness, with unsurprising results.

...

 

Only the comment field is required. Omitting the ID fields increases your risk of being mistaken for spam.